So again, yes it nice that you can use full frame lenses on crop bodies, but at the end everyone wins if Canon focus on good quality lenses for APSC EF-M (smaller but more resolving power), and good quality lenses for their new full frame mount RF (bigger glass, with less resolving power).

So in reality, that means that the likes Sony and Fujifilm are ahead of Canon and Nikon by about five years in their Research and Development for high-end mirrorless systems currently on the market. So surely, when Canon and Nikon do finally release a high-end, full-frame mirrorless system to compete with the current market leaders, it won’t just be something similar to what’s already available now with other brands? Surely it has to be something significantly better?

We’re striving for the best possible discussion and may delete comments using our editorial judgment. All comments containing links will be reviewed by VOSD staff before they are published.Read our full comment policy. For longer comments, consider submitting an op-ed to Voice of San Diego.Read the guidelines here.

I agree. Shooters used to make fun of the word “autofocus” just a couple years ago. Once people started getting their hands on Canon’s DPAF those naysayers started to grow quiet. When you use it on a gimbal, it’s easy to see just how powerful (and important) a tool it is for small crews and single shooters. I really don’t consider one man gimbal shoots without it now. I think it’s important that Panasonic deliver a mildly successful AF system with this camera. It doesn’t need to be the best in the market, but it does need to work well.

The new lightweight Nikon FTZ lens adapter provides compatibility for about 360 existing F-mount lenses from AI type onwards.

Secondly, if that scenario were to play out then I’d have to think seriously about following many others and moving over to a different brand. Why? Simply because of position in the market. If Canon, for example, released a full-frame mirrorless system that was essentially on par with the Sony a7riii and didn’t offer a significantly better experience, then why would I not go to the market leader?

NewsBrim Media Inc. (newsbrim.com) is an independent news portal that delivers well researched and quality news and articles. We publish news in Technology, Business & Politics Category. Our news reporters are most Experienced and Expert Members in the field of business and finance. Our news portal is purely dedicated to those who are searching for the business, technology and politics news from around the globe.

I shoot professionally with a 5D Mk4. There isn’t a single item in this camera to compel me to move to full frame mirrorless… as much as I was waiting for it.

“We are sitting on a capital work in progress of about Rs 35 crore and cash of about Rs 140 crore. So the funding is already ready for these projects. There could be an increase in equity capital over the next three years as a result of the conversion of shares, but that would be marginal,” said AK Jain, CFO, Apollo Pipes

Shorter battery life, viewfinder never as good as an optical one. No IBIS is a major mistake no matter what excuse they come up with.

In Australia, prices are set by the dealers, but the body directly converts to roughly AU$3,200 and the kit AU$4,700. In the UK the body is £2,350 and the kit £3,270.

The other way of reading the situation is that CCAs are being responsive to the market. Instead of trying to build up their reserves, they are doing everything they can to keep costs low for customers, showing how to be both competitive and responsive. Edison isn’t dipping into its reserves to keep rates low — it’s instead asking ratepayers for more money.