If you have any customized requirement need to be added, we will be happy to include this free of cost to enrich the final research study.

Yes I’ve written many times that when you factor in adapters and lenses and filters and filter holders added to bodies, there really isn’t much difference in size/weight/bulk between DSLR/mirrorless. You raise many valid points and I hope the engineers at Canon (and Nikon) don’t go the easy route and opt just for adapters.

Thanks for the link. From reading that short discussion though, it seems the contributors aren’t really sold on any supposed "benefits" of a shorter flange distance. Pros and cons

The Canon Mount Adapter EF-EOS R and Control Ring Mount Adapter EF-EOS R will be $100 and $200, respectively. The Drop-in Filter Mount Adapter EF-EOS R arrives in February 2019 for $400 with a variable ND filter or $300 with a circular polarizing filter. There will also be a $200 matching flash, the Speedlite EL-100.

It’s been a long time since Sony launched the full frame mirrorless revolution with the a7R a7 and way back in 2013. Finally 5 years later, all the major manufacturers, Nikon, Canon, Sony, and now Panasonic have full-frame mirrorless cameras that are capable of shooting video and stills.

Is there a reason they couldnt just copy sigmas style of mirrorless camera and just a normal flange built in and then there would be no need for an adapter and lenses would match up just fine

The EOS R is slated to ship in October. Its MSRP of $2,300 for the body and $3,400 for the kit with RF 24-105mm f4L IS USM lens seems a bit steep, given the A7 III’s $2,000 price tag, though for all we know the Nikon Z6′s will be equally high. The pricing seems more intended to fill a strategic gap between the 6D Mark II — now on sale for $1,600 — and the 5D Mark IV, currently at $3,100, for videographers who want something smaller than the 5DM4. 

Canon would be dumb as hell to orphan the EF mount. A really tight EF-to-M adapter sold with the lens might serve as an acceptable bridge, but abandoning current customers will likely sink them.

I’ve personally owned each but not at the same time. I can’t say I noticed a drop in quality but I also don’t have both to really test so results are probably true. There are reasons to have the Metabones over the MC-11 besides image quality though.

I find it absolutely hilarious that a transvestite with no balls, an IQ less than 30, and no personal integrity whatsoever thinks that he/she is trolling me. First you went from female to male so fast it’s hilarious, which completely justifies the transvestite designation. The lack of male genitalia and subsequent levels of testosterone which help produce courage and accountability further explains why you are doing everything you can to avoid answering the question. Third, if you were indeed “Trolling” then your original target was Gene. However you did this only after 2 months on a dead article under a name you change frequently. Of course though, if you did keep a solid handle, you would never be able to post like this due to the aforementioned cowardice. Knowing that anyone here on Ammoland could in fact call into question your actions or point to your stupidity on a regular basis would cause you to melt like a university snowflake(Made out of non fat soy based vegetable proteins of course) hearing that the first amendment protects every US citizen.

Authored by professional shooters from around the globe, Newsshooter is a place for professionals, educators, students and industry figures to discuss the practice and art of cinema in documenting the real world.

MTF has yet to announce prices for its new EOS R adaptors, but the company has already announced Nikon Z adaptors and its PL to Nikon Z Mount Adaptor is on sale for £420  (about $549) so these are definitely premium-quality adaptors for professional film makers.