When Canon or Nikon release a high-end mirrorless system into the market, will those cameras have the capacity to allow for perfect use of lenses currently used on DSLR systems? Now that might seem like a ridiculous question considering they are two completely different systems but I will put my hand up and say, perhaps naïvely, that I had assumed that the two makers would provide such a feature without a shadow of a doubt.

"We work diligently to show up for the residents of Flint and to let them know that this is not business as usual and their health will not be taken lightly, nor will cost be prioritized over lives."

I’ve been a canon user for over 30 years now and never complained but this is a missed opportunity. If I have to replace everything I might as well look at other brands.

Thanks. Good to see you haven’t drawn Aces and Eights yet my friend. Hope all is well on the home front.

Along with key manufacturers, their profiles, global market share, production volume, gross sales margin, revenue, manufacturing plants, and their capacities, material sourcing strategy, newly implemented technologies are also discussed in this report.

So in reality, that means that the likes Sony and Fujifilm are ahead of Canon and Nikon by about five years in their Research and Development for high-end mirrorless systems currently on the market. So surely, when Canon and Nikon do finally release a high-end, full-frame mirrorless system to compete with the current market leaders, it won’t just be something similar to what’s already available now with other brands? Surely it has to be something significantly better?

Canon on the other hand has a huge choice: they could stick with the EF mount and offer truly effortless conversion but that means foregoing the flange-distance advantage on lens designs shorter than, say, 50mm. Still even if they had a new mount, a fully function and compatible adapter for the EF is vastly easier to engineer and produce than Nikon’s options.

I prefer a clear distinction between APSC and full frame lenses line up. EF-M and EF-R will replace EF-S and EF, and it is ok if they are not compatible. No need to have full frame or medium format to be so called professional as long as you deliver quality images. Now Canon, please release lightweight L series for EF-M and a M camera with a bigger battery and a bigger grip (same remark for Sony, but with a fully articulated screen)

The coupling’s dynamic deflection reduced the risk of damage and cracking due to ground shifts and temperature changes. Its patented gasket transforms the pipe joint into a flexible connection and allows dynamic deflection of up to 4 degrees per side. The product can adapt to out-of-round pipe shape for optimum fit on both ends with its radial closing design and sealing system that can eliminate installation errors. Even if pipes are a bit out of alignment, the Hymax Grip’s dynamic deflection can still allow for the connection, meaning there is a smaller chance of mistakes during installation. These features make the coupling a long-term solution that reduces the need for future repairs and maintenance.

The Hymax Grip has a universal gripping system designed to restrain metal and plastic pipes and has a transition capability of up to 1.1 in. It can work with a wide range of pipe diameters, replacing Moore’s need to use a variety of size-specific sections, which would be necessary with mechanical joint couplings. The internal restraining design meant that there also was no need for rodding, an expensive and time-consuming installation.

“Folks can say what they want to say, but firefighters are living climate change. It’s staring them in the face every day,” he told the Associated Press.

ACCESS FULL REPORT: https://researchstore.biz/report/global-hdpe-pipe-and-fittings-market-research-report-2012-2023/76376/